Ann: Legal Proceedings, page-59

If Mr Williams was a probationary prospective employee (as within 1st month of different contract of employment) is that different to a full time employee?
Post #: 66531580
I am not sure that even if TER as a CO is a party to the actions
seems the six then directors maybe as individuals?
I lost the TER threaded post link to get more forensic with the "statement of claim" post=
seems that TER did take the mr Williams raised afTER his one month TERm (why only?was it assumed disgrunted?) issue on board and did an investigation (where there was already existing safeguards, & independent third parties?)=
and how big the statement of claim? wat the pages =
surely asic not litigious or vexatious or they maybe want a precedent on the board ?
maybe asic could of got a stronger weighted civil/criminal case to persecute or is that prosecute=
down to weight or wait with evidence=
maybe mr williams betTER suited in unfair dismissal if that was the/his/asic case
TER has more freedoms when a prospective employee is on probation, & they weight of take notice of a probation employee that was not going to be hired would be considerably less than a regular full time employee as expected, as a $$ matter only not a safetey matter or other more with necessity to forensically look at by all board busyness ?
hehe maybe can purge of some of the complacent derrs =