From Australian Ethical Super Fund: " A company with positive products and services can remain an ethical investment even though
it earns some revenue from a negative product or activity"
I don't think ethical funds require that the world eats no meat - just a major reduction in consumption is the aim. WOA's regen farming produces some meat but protects climate and environment with its methods. Can't see funds quibbling especially with the four pillars approach.
From Australian Ethical Super Fund: " A company with positive...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
