Your sarcasm is understandable, but I beg to differ. It would be best imo, that a fixed price off-take for a period of time that supports sufficient private debt /equity to see the project developed with substantial but dominant government money at risk. My opinion is a non-holder with taxpayer hat on, because governments are terrible at picking winners or backing projects that don;t end up blowing out in cost, opex and/or going broke.
Understandably, HAS holders will see too much government support as still not enough... congratulations to HAS if they can get more government support, the whole country seems to be looking to the government for a leg up onew way or another. I'm very happy the mining industry is getting support, without mining our standard of living would be much, much lower.
HAS Price at posting:
$2.71 Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)