Why is everyone here against Riley and Kent? It seems there are two compelling sides to this story, with points against and in favour of both. For example, Kent will return the $250k in severance if he is returned to his position. Doesn't seem like something you would do if you didn't have the company's interests at heart. The news reporting (ie Redrup's articles) seemed a bit one sided... and in general, I would put my trust in the founder of the company rather than some outside investors.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?