Actually after reading the Section 249D, it's apparent there's another motive behind the decision to push 2 directors previously ousted directors from CLIME investments by 94% of the shareholders from a previous company.
Something smells extremely fishy here - so I'll 100% vote against the decision.
Actually after reading the Section 249D, it's apparent there's...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 63 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SWF (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
12.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $27.86M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 12.0¢ | 12.0¢ | 12.0¢ | $3.96K | 33K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 159001 | 11.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 12.5¢ | 20000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.39pm 05/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SWF (ASX) Chart |