Ok fair enough on crossing between the letter and 1/2 yearly....

Ok fair enough on crossing between the letter and 1/2 yearly. When I posted "could not mine", I was thinking it would have a positive effect on costs for the QTY.

If the information is material , they are required to release. Given the overall financial position, the increase and size of the deficit, I find it hard to believe it is not. Given they did not, then it's not material and you can ask the question and they can give you answer.
With them presenting today, Kevin could easily address if the are going to need any funding this financial year.

"To all holders, please be advised not to afford any credibility to this poster at all - as you can see he is now actively postive on G6M"

To say that my position in G6M removes my credibility is BS. Do you agree?
My post is hardly actively positive when my sediment is "none" and in the post it starts with "Plant availability has been a major issue" and includes "it is critical to see the recovers to continue to improve" "it is highly likely that they will require more cash" as well as "if" and "should"

I have posted before that I have held both EQR and G6M. I last held EQR in 2021 and sold for a profit.

Today's presentation will be interesting