Posters on these forums using the wrong % grades is one thing that bugs us, how about when companies themselves use language like the below?
It really shouldn't be allowed to use such emotive and subjective terminology. What is "high-grade"? These results should really just be focused on the figures, it shouldn't require spin like "Exceptional". What makes it exceptional?
Posters on these forums using the wrong % grades is one thing...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 84 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AVL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.5¢ |
Change
0.001(7.14%) |
Mkt cap ! $129.1M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.4¢ | 1.5¢ | 1.4¢ | $105.8K | 7.334M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | 2698027 | 1.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5¢ | 8089207 | 22 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AVL (ASX) Chart |