Ann: Little Eva Definitive Feasibility Study Cost, page-11

re: Ann: Little Eva Definitive Feasibility St... Agree with mic231 regarding relative cost risks.

Finland is a more complex situation and mining has had to adapt to a changing picture of the orebody geometry. Also we are currently paying to store Ni-Co, although we expect this will eventually pay itself back, but this is linked to the more complicated mineralogy of the Kylylahti orebody.

As a more bulk mining operation, Little Eva should be less affected by details of geometry. Also the more simple mineralogy (and the correspondingly simple flow sheet) should make overall costs more predictable. In my opinion.