I thought it'd be against the law for a director of a public company to have security over the assets of the said company. Technically it's a conflict of interest.  He has an incentive to ensure the companies failure, take all the assets. (In this case I assume printing machines, clients etc.) leaving shareholders with nothing.  Anyone know what happens if he does trigger that clause?
Ann: Loan Funding, page-13
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add T3D (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.5¢ |
Change
-0.001(16.7%) |
Mkt cap ! $597.2K | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.6¢ | 0.6¢ | 0.5¢ | $1.009K | 201.5K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 935638 | 0.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.6¢ | 172712 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 10.09am 04/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| T3D (ASX) Chart |