I thought it'd be against the law for a director of a public company to have security over the assets of the said company. Technically it's a conflict of interest. He has an incentive to ensure the companies failure, take all the assets. (In this case I assume printing machines, clients etc.) leaving shareholders with nothing. Anyone know what happens if he does trigger that clause?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Loan Funding
I thought it'd be against the law for a director of a public...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add T3D (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $597.2K |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.5¢ | 0.5¢ | 0.5¢ | $209 | 41.77K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
4 | 1085750 | 0.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.6¢ | 302274 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
4 | 1085750 | 0.005 |
3 | 3127497 | 0.004 |
3 | 8766670 | 0.003 |
2 | 15700000 | 0.002 |
2 | 40500000 | 0.001 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.006 | 302274 | 1 |
0.007 | 103333 | 2 |
0.008 | 100000 | 1 |
0.012 | 3000 | 1 |
0.014 | 20000 | 2 |
Last trade - 12.50pm 05/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
T3D (ASX) Chart |