I thought it'd be against the law for a director of a public company to have security over the assets of the said company. Technically it's a conflict of interest. He has an incentive to ensure the companies failure, take all the assets. (In this case I assume printing machines, clients etc.) leaving shareholders with nothing. Anyone know what happens if he does trigger that clause?
I thought it'd be against the law for a director of a public...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
