Very disappointing results, given comments in initial release...

Very disappointing results, given comments in initial release such as ;

"Two holes testing this target, FLC-2017-002 (depth 607m) and FLC-2017-003 (depth 520m and continuing) are mineralised for their entire lengths".

Mineralised is misleading, maybe technically correct but not economically. Chalcopyrite and pentlandite obviously the key valuable minerals not present in significant quantaties, unlike pyrrhotite, the Fe sulphide which presumably comprises most of this intersection, has no effective value except geologically.