I reckon that KRogers is right on the money. If the flow is...

I reckon that KRogers is right on the money.

If the flow is double then half the trenches required or double the production. I accept that evaporation ponds may be bigger but evaporation times will not be different; it's a function of surface area. Can't comment on salt byproduct.

Regardless of everything (grades/flows/trenches/resource) we have a company with a clear and concise formula to make money and a definitive time table to execute. I'd rather receive a dividend from the company with lower grade/flow rate because they have set up a sustainable business than be proud to own shared in the company that talks about it's grade and potentially potentially bigger dividend. Show me the money!

I still can't find any evidence from any of the other companies that they have determined a sustainable brine flow rate from actual pumping.