Thanks Niu, presumably the evaporation figures are gross so...

Thanks Niu, presumably the evaporation figures are gross so would need any rainfall deducted which may be why it seems we are seeing net evaporation of < than 1300mm a year. In concept it seems simple but from all ORE's results, reports and spreadsheet errors it must be much more complicated than it seems. Time will tell I guess but at least it is a matter of how much profit ORE makes not if. Would be nice to know what the net evaporation for Chico has been over the last couple of years but doesn't seem to be freely available anywhere.