Sorry if I'm misunderstanding something, but I'm on a learning curve...
I could do with some clarification on this issue of grades vs proportion in sulphide form vs volume.
My understanding, gleaned from this board, was that whilst ASO's grades might be lower, a higher proportion of the nickel in the ground was in sulphide form compared to Mt Keith and therefore was more easily recoverable, and that this more than compensates for (ASO) lower grades. Meaning in effect that our resource is indeed comparable, or competitive, with Mt Keith. Is this not correct?
ASO Price at posting:
8.1¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
