Well that would work if one could safely assume that the address they have given is correct seeing that other things are not.
The way it current looks a communication might end up in Peter Torres desk, whom we still need confirmation on his current role there according to the clear and vital discrepancies in their website.
This is a forum where shareholders gather and discuss. Asking those questions, based on publicly available information that is clearly an issue, is not down ramping.
What you are saying is your frothing at the bit for graphite, you want to brush your teeth with it , you want graphed underwear, and you want everyone to scratch you behind the ear like that dog in your profile photo, and tell you yes yes yes we know, its graphite its good. You dont want to deal with general shareholder discussion and you are behaving like a glory hound who is digging for a bone that he can smell but has no strength left in his paws to dig and get to the finish line. You can bark all you want. But I raised a legitimate question and you raged on about misleading info when clearly there is evidence of that,
Additionally, you are now saying that if information is on an "Obscure location" on teh website that this is ok? And is not worth the comments that management has not updated the website and is causing confusion, yet again? You are arguing against yourself sir.
Dear Spidey, there should be no obscure location on a website. If there is, then that is extremely poor management of the company image, brand value and is yet again a reason why major media will not deal with MRC, because major media does their research thoroughly, and when they see things like that, they just won't deal with a company because they can not be sure that the information they will publish in an article is accurate.
Is is the most basic simple level of marketing and branding. yet for you its ok if it is in an obscure location.
And trying to say its obscure when you had the link 2 times given to you is simply you trying in a very small minded way to m,anourve a point that it is "in an obscure place"...when in fact this is not even the issue.
You are literally dictating that no one can post their own views in their own style because it is at odds with your opinion?
You have a history of this, including your post that was moderated for threatening me to immediately sell all my shares for all the legal costs I would have incurred for having a different opinion to yours. Literally that was your post. Hotcopper moderated it.
Expand
(20min delay)