Ann: Maiden Reserve at Bulletin to drive step-change, page-113

“His inferred knowledge of the ground is interesting and very useful, his bias has been stated and so need caution, his strategic naivety is also clear.”

I think your collective strategic naivety is far clearer. He seems to be dealing in technical facts rather than wishful thinking.

“He did at least have the backbone to state publicly and upfront that he's not objective regarding this company as he didn't get offered a job”

Lets not be selective here. He stated a 20 year association with the assets and Haoma. It wasn’t that he wasn’t offered a job, he stated they stopped paying him, big difference.

I’m not anchoring myself to anything or anyone, just appreciate same sane and logical input which seems solidly based on technical expertise.

Certainly a lot different to the rah rah crowds analysis.