To address your thoughts on the Palisade deal conditions and how easy it is for Palisade to walk away, the updates say "Subject to completion of final due diligence and receipt of investment committee approval required for each project’s Final Investment Decision" so to me the reads as Palisades investment committee doesn't like it then they can walk away. Given we have no other information I don't see how this can be interpreted any differently.
And for the concerns from LongCleanEnergy from the September update we have "Progress in finalisation of Infrastructure Project Investment towards a binding agreement" there is that magic word again "towards". That line has the other DEL classic "finalisation".
