@Bill Gates
Bill I could not agree more with you in your last post moderators should be allowed to do there jobs, personal attacks and bullying as you imply should not be allowed,
I suppose its one of the above reasons that itsagass got suspended
Oh and by the way Bill welcome to the ANP forum
Bill I am intrigued by your appearance today boy you have been a busy boy haven't you,
Bill you come on this thread claiming to add some rational debate,
May I ask when you intend to start that debate and just exactly what the subject matter will be,
because believe it or not BILL you have posted on this forum 17 times today and contributed absolutely nothing of substance,
You appear to have emerged on this forum spouting good conduct and manners
which is all well and good if this was the
GOOD CONDUCT & MANNERS FORUM
BUT ITS NOT
So what are we to take from your first 17 posts and childish cartoons Bill is this to be your style for the future on this forum
Or would you like to talk about this stock and inform the ill informed why it has taken over 2.5yrs to submit an ind study which the company always maintained was a major milestone yet never acted on
Why has it taken so long to get the monkey samples from the tox study in china
Why do the company keep doing back flips on RRMS one minute we are not going to carry it forwards as in the reason the EAP cannot be started,
yet in the next breath to contradict themselves and they say it could be used in combination therapy if this is the case then the EAP should have gone ahead as they are stating through official channels a use for 1102 in RRMS.
yet previously they maintained they would not be carrying it forwards due to lack of interest in this field in so many words anyway
As always Bill about as clear as Mud
One of our shareholders you sought to give a lecture to today on manners has asked a very relevant question in regards to half yearly report, and thus far I can confirm has not had a satisfactory reply to that enquiry and I am sure that if an answer were forthcoming he would be more than happy to share his findings with everyone on this forum.
A question that bothers me cash is of a paramount concern to ANP
I don't know how up to speed you are with this stock Bill but not to long ago we engaged two new NONE EXEC Directors onto our board, I believe part of the none execs role is to guide advise and support and mentor the CEO
So being as cash burn is a major concern Bill up for debate could you throw any light as to why in the last financial we are paying for consultants, I am aware of the consultants helping set up the grant but is this the only consultancy we are talking about and at what cost
just exactly how much we are paying these consultants is unknown because like I said this information is not forthcoming
Bill there are so many questions with little to no answers is there any wonder there is anger and discontent in this forum
This company met with a first strike at this last years AGM myself and another member spent amounts of cash from our own pockets contacting Shareholders for support which brought about the first strike
Bill I am a member of the ASA joined to seek further answers and guidance, you should see their report of what is expected or they would like to see once a company receives a first strike things are supposed to change.
Do a bit of DD Bill and tell me what has changed
We were on the verge Bill of monetising this company through generation of income through the early access programme for RRMS
Have you any idea Bill when this EAP will be started in patients with SPMS they stipulate potential after the mini trial possibly 18months away one would imagine at the earliest
Tysabri failed in the SPMS field
BUT they still have their sales of Tysabri for RRMS
Why I ask could we not have moved forwards with the 1102 for RRMS after all have they just not spruiked it same stage, better results from 1102 than tysabri
We could have then moved forwards with the EAP and could well have been earning income from that programme now as I write
The B cell tech into SPMS could have gone along in tandem with the RRMS trial
instead they have put it all on the line in the form of a $20mil trial by carrying the RRMS I presume carrying half of the study ie $10mil and the other half into the SPMS $10mil
thereby spending $10mil on a drug they have no intention of taking any further on a gamble that the SPMS trial will bear the fruits of success
One hell of a gamble from where I am sat as a shareholder with a substantial amount of capital tied up in this company
You will note Bill I ,mention presume I can only presume Bill because this board hides behind the none disclosure statement
So please Bill when you come as new face to forum you may well class folks as being rude I have no excuse for this, if this is how you perceive their reaction, but just take into consideration there are a lot of people bleeding badly here
if you made 12% today congratulations on your purchase Bill I commend you but please your perception to most on this forum do not really align and I am not talking as an individual here
Questions Bill there are to many
Answers Bill there are very few
I don't know how you will take this post Bill and to honest I don't really care but I have tried
not to be rude
and
tried to be honest
What was todays Ann all about, one can only assume they are trying to refresh the pipeline to the market
as all that was posted today is already well known by the informed on this forum
ONE HAS TO WONDER
and why it has taken so long to
Thanks for the background information you supplied. What I was basically pointing out was that in the last 70 or 80 posts that I read, such a lot was negative enough to make the forum appear dysfunctional. Facts were few on the ground and lots of HC posting rules were being contravened, much to the detriment and spirit of the forum. My point on rational discussion was that it didn't seem to exist and that all the bickering was a waste of time, so don't try and put that on me thank you very much.
(20min delay)