CNJ 0.00% 0.1¢ conico ltd

Ann: Market Update - Delay in Assay Results, page-216

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 9,951 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 3715

    Thanks lc for your expert opinion. Having said this, your answer seems to have been put together in only 30 minutes, which may be a reflection of the amount of research and effort that you are putting in. We will soon know.

    In addition, your statement that "A best interval of 7m of sulphide mineralisation over ~55m (can’t remember how deep it started think it was about 80m?), is not very confidence inspiring.

    For the record, I see no problem in using the term "ore body" i.e. it is completely normal when discussing mineral exploration. Indeed, an "ore body" does not need to be high grade or have high tonnages to be termed an "ore body". Rather, the more accurate term i.e. after extensive drilling and the assaying thereof, would be to say that the "ore body" that has been discovered is, or is not, economically viable.

    In a nutshell, an ore body is a mass of rock that contains ore/mineralisation from which a value can be extracted. However, not all ore/mineralisation within an ore body will be extracted. For the record, "ore bodies" are divided into reserves and resources.

    At this stage in proceedings i.e. before we have even received the first round of assay results from CNJ, IMHO, it is way to early to talk about the absence of an economically viable "ore body" at any of CNJ's tenements. However, you appear to be already doing this. I, on the other hand, am definitely not.

    Please note, that under JORC requirements, it will be very difficult for TAJ (as a competent person), to try and fool CNJ investors by hyping the results. Your insinuation that he will do so for personal gain is grossly unfair to say the very least.

    Summing up, you basically already see CNJ's three tenements as duds. In addition, and in the event that CNJ should release highly encouraging assay results from one or more of their tenements, you will not believe them, and you will thus not change your mind.

    I, on the other hand look forward eagerly to CNJ assay results with an open mind, and depending on how good or bad they turn out to be, I will then make my next investment decision, which will be to sell or continue to hold my very large position.

    Wishing you good fortune with your investment decisions in 2022.






 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add CNJ (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.