Eps growth means nothing if it comes at the expense of cashflow (over an extended period). Basically SGH eps growth is being paid out of cashflow...which is unsustainable. This is why Andrew Greach says the acquisition of Quindell is transormational. They have bought via equity in the main. So if it comes off finallly they actually get cash...and the business has been transformed. But the size, complexity and the queztionable nature of the operations, mean there aRe serious doubts and hence the shorters, about this transformation occurring and if there is no transformation then goodbye SGH as we know it. Okay perhaps overstated, but it makes a point, that i am again hoping so eone will refute, so I can buy in.
Re the WIP my understanding ezp. Re Quindell is the opposite.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Market Update
Eps growth means nothing if it comes at the expense of cashflow...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 163 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)