Firstly BLA wanted to get rid of BAF due to the "discounted" fees vs costs. Then they said they want to hold on to it because somehow the manager of BAF not being BLA would be bad for holder at the fund level. Sounds suss and logically invalid as usual. As with most of bluesky a conflict of interest reaches its logical conclusion.
Firstly BLA wanted to get rid of BAF due to the "discounted"...
Add WMA (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
98.0¢ |
Change
0.005(0.51%) |
Mkt cap ! $191.9M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 96.5¢ | 98.0¢ | 96.5¢ | $93.45K | 96.38K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 28583 | 96.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 98.0¢ | 74154 | 9 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 26/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WMA (ASX) Chart |