No, that's not right in this case. There is an advantage in being a big shareholder, ie the voting power. You can vote through a deal that destroys all the existing equity, including your own. Eg, you could push through a transfer of the assets to a new entity. So if you can do a deal with the debt holders, you can expunge the debt and have a chunk of the new owner of the assets.
It could be done in this case because FW has some big shareholders he could deal with.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Material Terms of Employment (Chief Executive Officer)
No, that's not right in this case. There is an advantage in...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 40 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)