Share
42 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 94
clock Created with Sketch.
06/08/21
10:19
Share
Originally posted by ChampKind01:
↑
Curios as to why there is some negativity surrounding the monthly subscription model? Particularly if there is a usage based trigger at certain points. There is so much flexibility in this model, not to mention scalability. e.g. 1 year deal @ $X for Y amount of usages per month - IF Y amount of usages is exceeded within the month, then a premium is paid for the excess usages OR the client is lifted up to a higher tier in the pricing model. Simple to administer and account for on both sides of the fence and would give the Resapp team some assurity when planning and managing server loads and other computational resources. Have seen this tiered pricing model work well in other health related industries where its hard to forecast volume, case by case complexity and resource consumption. So to me subscription model doesn't necessarily translate to less revenue in the short or long term. That said I am sure that medgate and alodokter would be getting pretty sweet deals in the short term, but it doesn't take away from the validity of the model. Keen to hear opposing thoughts though.
Expand
Actually, now that I think about it. The health industries where i observed similar models in action had an insurer OR payer involved in the transaction.... Wonder if this is Mike Connells broader health industry / medibank experience flowing through...?