The Shine case reads like a cut and paste of the SGH one, which was already a difficult to prove proposition based on recent precedents.
SGH was unable to find a third party litigation funder who wanted to touch this case, meaning they were fully exposed to the risks/costs if it failed.
What are the odds that they found another third-rate law firm to share the risk / reward with instead?
The Shine case reads like a cut and paste of the SGH one, which...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$7.22 |
Change
-0.070(0.96%) |
Mkt cap ! $5.227B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $7.22 | $7.27 | $7.16 | $18.89M | 2.620M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3335 | $7.20 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $7.23 | 5000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 14/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| A2M (ASX) Chart |