The way I see it is 51% and 49% is how they split the value of the two companies, it has nothing to do with who is going to control it. Someone correct me if I am wrong please.[/QUOTE]
51% Vs 49% is a huge deal. If it wasn't why wouldn't 50/50 work... Control, Or lack of it.
There's no way 51/49 was a coincindence around values. It's a total strategy that I imagine would have been the deal breaker for the party wanting 51%.... As the 2% is everything in a voting situation!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- TAW
- Ann: Merger Update
Ann: Merger Update, page-98
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 24 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add TAW (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
EQN
EQUINOX RESOURCES LIMITED.
Zac Komur, MD & CEO
Zac Komur
MD & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online