Share
2,116 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1187
clock Created with Sketch. 10/07/24
11:29
Share
Originally posted by JB1975:
↑
I saw the same article - same author - in the Herald Sun and The Australian. That was the author I emailed. Before emailing him (and someone else did as well) I googled to see if he was maybe a rookie - he wasn't. In the brief search on his name I found probably a linked in summary that if I recalled correctly stressed his interest in integrity in markets or something similar so, although I didn't mention I'd seen that, I sort of hoped to get a reply even it was only to the effect that - yes I recorded Silviu that's what he said or perhaps no. I'm treating the non reply as either he doesn't want to make Silviu look bad - which he wouldn't at all if he'd quoted him accurately, or that the reporter isn't supper confident that what he put in quotes for Silviu is actually exactly what the FDA said either. "And instead, what they said was 'no, we've thought this through, and you've convinced us that the clinical data are very strong ," Prof Itescu said." You've got enough to get approval for children - go ahead and file, and then consider how to take the product into adults". Would you please confirm that that is a correct quote rather than that you or an editor may have altered it somewhat for brevity or by mistake?
Expand
" You've got enough to get approval for children - go ahead and file, and then consider how to take the product into adults".
(20min delay)