Jarma thanks for sharing your breakdown and info. I don’t think...

Jarma thanks for sharing your breakdown and info. I don’t think anyone disputes the potential of our tenements and consequently the SP if things come to fruition. I hate to sound like a broken record although I think a big factor here is management. You’ve mentioned that they made some decisions which can’t really be pinned as poor on their behalf and I can agree - hindsight is 20/20, and there is some logic for obtaining more ground and trying to strike great intercepts there.

That being said the direct lack of communication and transparency makes it difficult to trust the management of this company and that’s what it comes down to. Rapport with shareholders is important just like any other relationship and this department has been heavily neglected and does not instill confidence for current and future investors. Just like some mines in SA or DRC, the ground is good the political risk is high - and the matter of the fact is this is a risk that is perceived as high and I’m not surprised people perceive our management in such light.

Here are just some of FEW examples; 1) failure to inform shareholders of changes to plans 2) no mention of claim dispute outcome 3) lack of information from change of directors NOT once but twice 4) lack of promised updates on development of tenements 5) where’s our model promised a year ago 6) curve ball on delineating cancet 7) icobalt anyone? 8) delays delays delays with no reasonable explaination (they might have one and not told us) 9) communication with only a select few shareholders 10) Gino and Russel moving on to next IPO 11) run by non execs and the list goes on and on and on and on... we’re left in the shadow and have no idea what the heck is happening or why until they tell us and more than half the time we get something far different than expected and if it’s one thing about investors is that they hate uncertainty and that’s all MTCs management is about.