Says the person referencing "www.historynewsnetwork.org" and "www.miamiherald.com" in their posts. Interesting ideology you have. You apparently value these sources, as a "health professional", over the NIH (National Institute of Health) and other scientific organisations which you discredited previously.
Considering I don't have access (as most people do not) to the Australian Medicinal Handbook I use what resources are available. Would you like a monopoly on information now as well?
"The Drugs.com Drug Information Database is powered by four independent leading medical-information suppliers: Wolters Kluwer Health, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Cerner Multum and IBM Watson Micromedex. Individual drug (or drug-class) content compiled by these sources is peer reviewed and delivered by Drugs.com." - Seems reliable enough to me to give people an overall picture.
MXC Price at posting:
2.9¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
