Share
829 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 213
clock Created with Sketch.
06/03/23
17:34
Share
Originally posted by phx:
↑
Makes a lot of sense as MIN would probably have talked to major NWE holders before starting a takeover. They would have wanted firm commitment's. The best explanation I have heard so far.As you were a director of a listed company you should know ASIC will not investigate anything, especially for a 6c company, unless you give them solid proof of something first. MIN have lawyers checking everything they have done - before they do it. ASIC will be extremely reluctant to spend time and $$ without proof. They are not going to come along and spend time on a fishing expedition because of something, a maybe, I feel or we just don't like what has happened. So why does MIN have a responsibility to NWE? MIN have a responsibility to their shareholders, not the NWE shareholders. Prelim drill results and a lot of other info on the tenements may be market sensitive to NWE. That does not make it market sensitive to MIN - especially when you are talking only preliminary results. Yes, i'm pissed with what has happened but all this talk of ASIC does not help. It just gives people a false reason to complain. Time to move on.
Expand
Hey fix - nothing trivial about these complaints. More an opportunity for ASIC to justify their existence. Big boys are playing dirty and the masses are calling them to book.