Hi JD & Frog
Yes I did have the wrong figure for the optimised case. $53 + $25 = $78 not $88.
And my expansion figure was $40 + $25 = $65
where in both cases the $25 is the premium that 69% would attract above 62%. I understand that the premium would differ when 62% is $40 Vs $53 but probably not by too much.
There is a note d) in Table 5. attached to the "all in breakeven price" of 62% that says it is the break even of post construction cash flows. This I believe suggests it is calculated using opex and no capex.
So in the optimised case if the 62% price is $53 then MGT will be receiving revenue at $78/t. If that is a break even position it then means that the costs must be $78/t. In the expansion case if the 62% price is $40 then MGT will be receiving revenue at $65/t. If that is a break even position it then means that the costs must be $65/t.
So costs per t would be $78 for the optimised case and $65 for the expansion.
All figures quoted are US$
Have I got that right?
Baz
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MGT
- Ann: Mines and Money Conference Presentation
Ann: Mines and Money Conference Presentation, page-27
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MGT (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
18.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $20.76M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
5 | 67424 | 17.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
18.0¢ | 104903 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
4 | 58424 | 0.175 |
9 | 222351 | 0.170 |
3 | 17560 | 0.165 |
2 | 90000 | 0.160 |
1 | 10000 | 0.155 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.180 | 54903 | 1 |
0.185 | 54321 | 2 |
0.190 | 44358 | 1 |
0.195 | 8310 | 3 |
0.200 | 132206 | 3 |
Last trade - 10.04am 14/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
MGT (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable