Ann: Mining Agreement with Arruwurra Aboriginal Corporation, page-139

"the notion sedimentary “cannot” be used Is non factual and misleading"

I always said it was about cost. And it seems you agree.

"So it’s a cost relationship for which igneous is preferred"

And consider NT's 20% royalty on the bottom line and management just gave away 2.5% off the top line.

I also said they may process sedimentary rock in China. But why China and not elsewhere? The answer was in the thread I posted. Does anyone know the amount of uranium in the deposit? I do. But let's see how well researched holders are...