OK but I'm only explaining how the SA stakeholders might view this. It's not about the merits of lawyers. It's about the trustworthiness of the company as a whole. Because despite legal agreements it's possible to evade the law. Plenty of examples where companies simply shut down and rebirth. This is about how the SA stakeholders would view WWI.
I don't want to get into a discussion about the merits of lawyers, and the nature of the legal I've posted enough on that before.
I just wanted to reinforce the importance of not repeating the nonsense of rogue shareholders attempting to pressurise government decision makers.
Ann: Mining Right Application Update, page-174
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 184 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add WWI (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.2¢ |
Change
-0.001(4.17%) |
Mkt cap ! $29.18M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.3¢ | 1.3¢ | 1.1¢ | $44.56K | 3.731M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | 3008389 | 1.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2¢ | 99545 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.14pm 27/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WWI (ASX) Chart |