OK but I'm only explaining how the SA stakeholders might view this. It's not about the merits of lawyers. It's about the trustworthiness of the company as a whole. Because despite legal agreements it's possible to evade the law. Plenty of examples where companies simply shut down and rebirth. This is about how the SA stakeholders would view WWI.
I don't want to get into a discussion about the merits of lawyers, and the nature of the legal I've posted enough on that before.
I just wanted to reinforce the importance of not repeating the nonsense of rogue shareholders attempting to pressurise government decision makers.
OK but I'm only explaining how the SA stakeholders might view...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 184 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add WWI (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.5¢ |
Change
0.001(7.14%) |
Mkt cap ! $38.12M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.5¢ | 1.5¢ | 1.5¢ | $8.417K | 564.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 1860797 | 1.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5¢ | 253654 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 30/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WWI (ASX) Chart |