Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

TIH

0.00%

0.0¢ tillegrah limited

That right we are only share holders , what right do we have , I...

First 15 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
brindy1

309 Posts.

02/03/17

06:59

Post #: 23030672
Share

Originally posted by jake0002 ↑

ok thx
1. I happened to notice, re the balance of 281.25m shares = 46.875m x 6mths = exactly?
also, in a/cs, Note Page 9 shows the $71,875 from Lanstead which is Nov and Dec drawdowns.
So I think the Sept payment from Lanstead of $843,750 is included in Contributions of Capital figure of $1,009,037? (unless there is other CR proceeds?).

2. what we see for first time is the description of Sharing Agreement named an Equity Swap Arrangement !
They value this Swap under the Monte Carlo model (which is used for valuing Options etc). Monte Carlo model seems an appropriate name for the LWP "bet".
(Why call it a sharing agreement when one side gets all the benefit for little risk, and the other side gets all risk, all downside, and little benefit?)

3. Auditors value balance of the "swap" ie the remaining undrawn balance of $4.2m as only $173,251. So that just goes to prove what a crock of S##t the LWP response was to the ASX - when ASX queried why LWP did not get s/h approval for the investment in FRB.
I think there is more to the fact that the Auditors have decided this Sharing Agreement is in fact a Swap - but am not clear what the implications are.
LWP directors argued that the assets of LWP at June 2016 were about $10m.
They stated that because they said that Lanstead had made an investment of about $6m. I think they argued that the Sharing Agreement allowed LWP to claim the $5.6m sent back to lanstead was a "deposit' ie an asset of LWP.
And here we are, just a matter of months down the track, and the value of that "investment" of $4.2m is worth just $173,000.
I said at the time that this Lanstead deal was baloney. The claim that LWP had secured CR funding of $6m was rubbish. That undrawn funding was always only contingent funding.

hey, but its OK, because it is only shareholders money that has pee'd down the toilet.

it is the integrity of the ASX which suffers in all of this.

cheers

Expand

That right we are only share holders , what right do we have , I say we vote them out ! On incompetence. I am still amazed with The ASX , In the incompetence in investingagtion in the board members An company one please explain letter is all we get !

LWP Price at posting: 0.2¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
1 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

AI stocks: What to expect in 2024-25

Talking Australia's very competitive property landscape: Realty Talks

FMG

Andrew Forrest was seemingly possessed by the spirit of hydrogen – now he's cut 700 jobs and canned FFI

EVN

Evolution shares up 3% on quarterly results for June showing rise in gold production

NRX

Noronex joins forces with South32 to look for copper in Namibia