@Davy Boy It is becoming obviously apparent that you don't read the context of my posts, the previous wasn't another dig at missed timelines it was more to do with the fact that we have engaged an expert and that as 90% of his initial work would of been already completed then it would of been quite easy for him to finalise it, considering it was almost completed 4 moths ago.
I really don;t know why I have burnt bridges, although there was a glimmer of hope when the company secretary replied that someone will get back to me in a week but MEH. Some accused the way I write questions could be the issue, I am more inclined to think that the company cannot answer them and it could be for a various amount of reason which would include hmmmmm, too hard........
As for being counter productive to posts that you deem are complaining, think what you like but it is a double sided sword if you think that continual posting of a "good" post that are only bringing up the good points over and over are also counter productive. Ignoring the negatives of a company and its history could be expensive. For what it is worth, and regardless of what you think, I post what I deem to be a concern and if it helps some other investor to actually step back and think before plowing in on the hype that
@ans25 so readily admitted to recently, then all well and good. I will also re-iterate that I am invested in GPP as well and I want it to be successful, I will also increase my holding WHEN they release the Commercial Plan if I believe it to be a doable project that doesn't have another 4 years of trialling, or focus shifting attached to it.
Congratulations on getting the company to reply to you, I know they reply to a few but MEH, if they feel inclined to ignore no big deal to me. It is obvious that I have not breeched any HotCopper TOU's so I will continue to post what I deem fit.
