Sure, I am referring to how BHP did not historically find enough...

I'm making a point about his claims the stock is complete trash. If he actually answers the question then the answer would be yes, 2% is considered high grade. A logical counterpoint to this would be that 2% needs to be over significant enough area to actually matter. Which is a fair point. But if he admits that, he has to admit that we're still waiting on a shit ton more infill drilling and he's been trolling the entire time with zero intention of engaging in a respectful debate with anyone here. Bearish views are fine but spamming the thread with one liners....

Sure, I am referring to how BHP did not historically find enough near surface hits to justify their interest (they only want tier 1 deposits) and since then, AW1 has come in and delivered a number of results at near surface. They are finding them pretty consistently as opposed to before, with the current methods. Correct me if you disagree.