It appears to me that the silver is the biggest contributor to...

It appears to me that the silver is the biggest contributor to the AuEq - beating the gold, copper and stibium in the below samples at least.

T5/West Wing did not show silver, only Stoney did. So it appears that silver is valuable if it occurs in a particular target.




So the silver is very interesting, but I'm not sure which resources are still pending silver assays. Also of note, Stibium is showing up widely (have Korbel/RPM been re-assayed yet?).



From management's mouth - apparently soil samples are a good indicator of underlying gold. I'd assume soil is more reliable than rock chips. Muddy Creek from memory has a lot of widespread soil samples - "A total of 21 soil samples were collected over a 1.5km traverse and all but two of these samples were greater than 1.0g/t gold. The soils averaged 2.5g/t gold, with a high of 6.1g/t gold."


It sounds like arsenopyrite is more purely gold, with lower chance of byproducts. I remember arsenopyrite at Cathedral.



A lot of the top rock chips are not actually from Gold, but from by-products.

The 3 samples with high gold actually had very low silver - maybe arsenopyrite.


For soil samples, it was not Stoney showing up, but the other 2 prospects. 10 samples at 1.2g/t and above. Silver was less impressive in the soil compared to the rocks. Stibium in soil at T5 was quite good. Copper was ok.

Stoney got re-sampled. The following would have flown under the radar before re-sampling. Stibium assays look impressive. 2 samples off the charts >10,000. Silver was very high in 1 sample (2720ppm).




Can't complain about these results, but I assume they'll remain lower priority than RPM/Train areas.