I suggest you and everyone else go back and read the announcement of 13 October 2020, which was the release of assay results of SDD189.
So according to the announcement of 13 October, which is after SDD190 had been completed, SDD190 was the third and last hole designed to "define an initial ore reserve" and that SDD190 was not a geotechnical hole. Furthermore the program of drilling three geotechnical holes was currently being undertaken as at 13 October 2020.
So two things:
1. as at 13 October SDD190 had been completed but neither SDD191 or SDD192 had been but for some reason the company already has the results of SDD191 and SDD192 but not the results of SDD190.
2. as at 13 October SDD190 was clearly included as the third hole in a three-hole program designed to complete the work necessary to define an initial Ore Reserve. But in today's announcement not only is the result of SDD190 still not available it has been "downgraded" to being a geotechnical hole. It also appears that two of the geotechnical holes that were being drilled as at the 13 October announcement has been upgraded to being part of the work for the initial ore reserve, even though the reported assay results for those two holes are very average.
I remember that the company played similar silly buggers with the assay results at Ohio Creek, constantly changing the number and id of the holes they were drilling, as they deflated the cap raising hype associated with that rainbow. To me, it almost looks like a feature of their modus operandi, not a bug.
