Ann: More spectacular RC results from Mulga Bill, page-38

Hey Von,

Yes, I wasn't trying to say it's correct to look at averages, I know the economics will all be worked out during feasibility studies, but just for fun I was trying to understand how many grams per tonne would there be if this was one perfectly homogeneous mineralised interval. And, yes on re-checking the maths, you are correct.

I'm very much looking forward to the assays for holes 23MBRC010, 23MBRC011 and 23MBRC012. These holes are 550 to 650 odd metres to the North of 23MBRC006A, so if they come up with some good hits, I will be quite happy.

	23MBRC006A
	7	m @	8.13	g/t	=	0.8	g/t over the 67m interval
	6	m @	589.44	g/t	=	52.8	g/t over the 67m interval
	1	m @	1.09	g/t	=	0.02	g/t over the 67m interval
	6	m @	396.58	g/t	=	35.5	g/t over the 67m interval
	1	m @	94.4	g/t	=	1.4	g/t over the 67m interval
	46	m @	0	g/t	=	0.0	g/t over the 67m interval
Total (averaged)	67	m @	90.6	g/t (average) over the 67m interval

	23MBRC008
	4	m @	0.1	g/t	=	0.003	g/t over the 149m interval
	1	m @	0.9	g/t	=	0.006	g/t over the 149m interval
	4	m @	0.8	g/t	=	0.021	g/t over the 149m interval
	4	m @	22.1	g/t	=	0.593	g/t over the 149m interval
	2	m @	1.27	g/t	=	0.017	g/t over the 149m interval
	4	m @	0.88	g/t	=	0.024	g/t over the 149m interval
	9	m @	0.47	g/t	=	0.028	g/t over the 149m interval
	19	m @	12.83	g/t	=	1.636	g/t over the 149m interval
	4	m @	0.19	g/t	=	0.005	g/t over the 149m interval
	98	m @	0	g/t	=	0.000	g/t over the 149m interval
Total (averaged)	149	m @	2.3	g/t over the 149m interval