Supposedly worth only $3.70 for 60% of it?Dodgy figures about...

you SK are NOT a lithium expert.

There IS NO single overarching lithium market price, because lithium is unstable and exists in combination with other elements, I have posted on this a few days ago.

Mr Lithium, will put you straight on that. The Chinese are the ones doing perfect execution of taking candy from a baby, shareholders like yourself are very happy to settle for the dregs.

The Chinese have plenty of the wrong sort of lithium which they are using as defective supposed 'Li price' and who cares?! Certainly not you.

Here for the nth time is a consummate analysis by the expert. He makes it clear there is no single Li price, there are a range of Li prices.

It's crucial to understand why. But you're busily fanning Tony Rovira. As a commercial dealer Tony makes a good geologist.

The role of Mark Creasy in this is unknown and that may be what has taken the choice out of Tony's hands. He may be the reason they rejected Joe Lowry as a mediator in advance off take sales, which would have maximised shareholder value. We may never know.
But $3.70 is an insult especially to those shareholders who held out for Tony, believing he had the smarts to make a very decent discovery. Oh yeah, zero for the other tenements? Zero for the nickel? It's unbelievable really that Tony has fanboys in here with these realities staring at us in the face.

Supposedly worth only $3.70 for 60% of it?

Dodgy figures about the supposed Li price.