MDRC228 (13m at 7.02g/t) includes 0.9m at 87.89g/t from 185m....

MDRC228 (13m at 7.02g/t) includes 0.9m at 87.89g/t from 185m.
MDRC215 (26m at 8.29g/t) includes 1m at 189.17g/t from 84m.

my main question remains unanswered. I acknowledge there is certainly something there, with the scope to grow, but when it comes to mining and production economics, what will results like the above mean?

my understanding is that there's a lot of dirt to extract, transport and process for relatively little gain.

the grades sound amazing. bonanza like grades, but I'd prefer consistent or continuous hits of say 50-100m+ of between 0.4 and 1g. If you scan through the image of CCM early reporting, which I attached to a recent post in this thread, you'll know what I mean. also, have a look at similar tables from GOR from 3 or so years ago. you'll get my drift.

I'm not downramping, I'm just trying to understand what this might mean for project feasibility.