Thanks MarkyBoy49 and others who did the Ni % sulphides calculations (and Cu%) from the interpreted visual sulphide percentages made onsite by the geologist for MTJV001 diamond hole. When looking at the PGE's values from the Ni%, we should remember UFX's input that these visual estimates of % sulphides made by the onsite geologist, are very subjective and another geologist would interpret the visual % of sulphides very differently i.e. lower, higher, similar. If indeed the laboratory assayed Ni% from MTJV001 are similar to the visuals and calc's made, and if the Ni% vs PGE's (g/t) correlation from GAL's lab. assays holds, the MTJV001 hole could return some very-impressive PGE values.........
I haven't done this for Cu % yet.
Also, note that the MTJV001 hole is sited about 50m NNW of a surface gossan that sampled anomalous Ni and Pd. If there is a correlation between the deeper, fluid-altered ultramafics encountered in the MTJV001 hole (hydrothermal pathway to surface / significance??) and the surface gossan with Ni and Pd, this may have important implications for the two surface gossans located 1-2 kms south of MTJV001 and what may lie beneath the regolith between these surface gossan locations and the target horizon.
Kind regards OldGeo
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- GSR
- Ann: Mount Thirsty JV Exploration Update
Ann: Mount Thirsty JV Exploration Update, page-74
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 66 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add GSR (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online