MRC 0.00% 2.6¢ mineral commodities ltd

Ann: MRC Agrees Settlement Terms with GMA Garnet, page-11

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 401 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 278
    Doing some further digging I think I have found a partial explanation for the total COGS/t being less than the production cost/t.

    In the 2020 HY report MRC states that the material improvement in COGS was "due to a material positive garnet inventory adjustment during the half-year due to settlement of the stockpile areas", and that without this adjustment the Revenue-COGS ratio would have been 1.6x or approx $69.88 per ton. While this makes some sense it still leaves the COGS less than the production costs for the 1H/2020.

    If this is correct it raises another question as to why the garnet inventory was so grossly underestimated previously, by a factor of 2.4x. It's hard to imagine how as an experienced sandminer you could look at a stockpile of minerals and make such a mistake...
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add MRC (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.