Ann: MRG HMS - Corridor Central Aircore Drilling Update, page-31

First 31 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
earmelon

1,627 Posts.

132

16/10/19

19:30

Post #: 40917443
Share

Zircon accounts for 80% of the revenue is not the case for all, 36% zircon is ridiculously high and only really found in Australia...and the overall tonnage are usually not very big...

Originally posted by Peppie: ↑

Thanks earmelon for that info.

Probably a bit early for me to make any assumptions (particularly with the three samples), but I'm going to make a rough comparison of ilmenite to the iron ore market, which many here may understand a little better.

Lower grade ilmenite is like lower grade iron ore. It requires a lot more processing, energy and with ilmenite - sulphuric acid and the chinese don't want to pay a lot for this product (they don't want to pay anything for anything).

Western pigment producers (Chemours, Huntsman, Tronox, etc) have moved into a clean environment and only take high grade material (Leucoxene, Rutile). You won't find low grade material going into the U.S, Europe, Quebec/Canada. All low grade mainly heads to China, but even they are starting to move away from that (will take years). If you look into slagging ilmenite, that's where they will be, but again years away.

Slimes
15%, on face value - manageable for sure. Probably some similarities to Kenmare there. (You could read into them for more info). As I said, it's a complex area of a sand plant and this is where metallurgical results kicks in.

Zircon / Rutile
Okay, here's the fiddly part of all this (based on earmelon's 2.7%).

It's a pretty low number (probably not want you want here, but there are no perfect deposits - anymore). If the slimes were single digit (even low single digit), then that improves the overall metrics.

These two products are the cream of a sand mining operation, here's an example of that.

This deposit is overall around 7-8% HM. You can see 40% of the HM is Zircon/Rutile, but 84% of the revenue.

As earmelon stated, if the ilmenite turns out to have a decent grade of TiO2, that's good news. If it doesn't, you've got a problem (I won't sugar coat that), the Zircon and Rutile grades are just not strong enough.

Think about the above slide. If the offtaker said we don't want the ilmenite (for whatever reason), it's only 15% of the revenue, far from a company killer.

P

(just my view).

Expand

if you look at Iluka’s resource in Sri Lanka, you are looking at 3% zircon content, and if you look at Sierra Leone reserve, only contains 1.3% rutile content...zircon and rutile are definitely the cream of the crop in mineral sand, But not every project can get high % of zircon, especially overseas...

we only need to compare ours to our neighbors, the Chinese to the north and the Rio project to the south, which have similar (slightly lower) assemblage to ours...and if the Chinese are already mining their project, Rio pushing ahead to mine, I am very confident our projects will be economical if we hit similar or higher percentage of HMS.

MRQ Price at posting: 0.7¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
13 Upvote

2 Great analysis

Reply