oh yeah thats makes sense, but the part i was specifically wondering about was that you seemed to be implying that between putting those assemblege figures forward that you have compared below, that the actual definition of what counts as Ilmenite had changed.
so in your post, the first copy and pasted part that states 'note: ilmenite =....', to define what counts as ilmenite. Are you saying that definition changed from Koko to the latest assembleges? i couldnt find an equivalent note on Koko that defines what was being counted as ilmenite.
I assume that its been the same definition all along. Am i wrong?
Ann: MRG HMS - New High Quality Mineral Assemblage Results, page-58
Add MRQ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.788M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 45 | 123814470 | 0.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2¢ | 62188422 | 35 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 31/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| MRQ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable