A geophysicist would be more qualified to answer this Jordan. However, (my comment as a non geophysicist) SGQ's geophysical maps and sections have been spot on to date, I don't see any reason why their MT interpretation would be any different in accuracy to what they have presented in the past. I would suspect they would have played with all sorts of data for their modelling and interpretations before releasing the model deemed to be of best fit.
Cheers,
Helmenesh.
Ann: MT Survey Continues to Unlock Mt Alexander, page-18
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SGQ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $24.71M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 770000 | 2.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4¢ | 129999 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.27pm 09/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SGQ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable