wait, what?! - "There is a reason why there are no results - It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realise why there are no results"
sorry, you'll have to spell it out for me?
Are you indicating Mk1 was a duster and Scott is holding the news back from the market because he refuses to release bad news?! ... so the seismic, the mud gas, the fluorescence, the permeability indications, the announcements and webinars discussing condensate and volatile oil, Scott's words regarding "success" , "a working hydrocarbon system", "proven source, seal, trap and reservoir", "basin is filled to spill" and "discovery if not for equipment failure" all made up? Or are you saying that the core samples completely contradict all the other data obtained and so Mk1 is a duster?
SP dropped from 38c to 15c because it's a spec explorer and there was no news expected for at least 6 months, then it dropped to 10.5c for a day because Scott's CR at 12c saw sophs dumping.
And as for being completely f*#cked,... so Scott's 77 million shares, Zimbabwe's economic future and the 15 identified prospects in a basin with high case potential of 45Tcf will be completely abandoned?!
absence of core data is a complete mystery to me, and failure at Mk2 will require a reset no doubt, but the overly dramatic delivery of "100% unsugarcoated f*ed" sounds to me like you are not getting enough attention at home
