Then theres no harm stating the same is there and that we have the funds for it?
Isn't that the point of the FSC, to seek clarification on matter pertaining to Ivz from the CEO?
As long as holders feel they need clarification then QED there exists ambiguity.
Are just supposed to sit open mouthed in adoration then?
Make him make all holders understand what is and what is not going to happen and funded ,then ask does anyone have any more questions on that matter.
Won't be another opportunity.
Tc
Then theres no harm stating the same is there and that we have...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 83 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
