Positive announcement but why omit the conductivity of the conductors? The only reason would be if they were low and hence the interpretation would be that they are not massive sulphides. Looking back at Chalice's announcements, their EM plates were ~10000S and 5300S (the latter of which was not mineralised). Still a good chance to be mineralised sulphides but, assuming a lower conductance, probably stringer and not massive.
Bas.
Ann: Multiple Compelling EM Conductors at Newleyine Prospect, page-8
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.8¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $11.29M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.8¢ | 1.8¢ | 1.7¢ | $19.77K | 1.099M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2303937 | 1.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.8¢ | 428439 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.26pm 27/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| MAN (ASX) Chart |